Blackwater joins the war on drugs
One of our agents in the field pointed us to this exciting new development in the war on drugs: $15 billion worth of it is being outsourced to military contractors, including the ever notorious Blackwater USA:
“This gives us the opportunity to bid on this work,” said Linda Hartwig, an ARINC spokesperson. “We don’t have a lot of details yet, but we do know that this is an expansion of what [the U.S] is already doing to fight drug trafficking, and that 80 percent of the work will be overseas.”
Hartwig said the other participating vendors are defense giants Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon, and security contractor Blackwater USA. Blackwater confirmed its participation, but the other vendors did not respond to inquiries.
The vendors will compete for a series of task orders covering a wide range of products and services. These could include anti-drug technologies and equipment, special vehicles and aircraft, communications, security training, pilot training, geographic information systems, and in-field support.
I'm having a hard time parsing my own reaction to this news. I guess it shouldn't come as any surprise that the war on drugs can actually get demonstrably worse by some significant measure. I guess.
» More ways to bookmark this page
|
Recently @ DoseNation
|
|
On the general nature of the war: my favorite argument is usually that if we ban "dangerous substances", why is mountain climbing and skiing allowed? Skiing is actually my favorite sport for practising, I have of course fallen on slopes many times, but have never had an accident while skiing. But still it is dangerous; today, after several years, I'm still moved by the death of the French skier Regine Cavagnoud.
The whole cultural system accepts the idea that some subjects may be protected against their will. I believe women are still such subjects - women are nowadays allowed to practise ski jumping, but not to participate in ski flying (jumping on the largest hills, with distances over 200 meters possible), another example: a woman participating in a cliff diving competition was explicitly banned "for her own safety". In the same way drug prohibition means protection against the subject's will.
Just see - this is not a "War on Drugs", it's a war for your mind! The State sees itself authorized (by whom?...) to mobilize all its police forces - so that you don't get to see something that "doesn't exist"! How is it possible? How happens nobody sees it as injustice, a waste of time and money and utter idiocy - that billions of dollars are being spent just to keep people from being in an "altered state"!! I'm not sure if there is such an expression in English, I know it from my native Polish - "to fire a cannon at a mosquito". But it stresses rather the ridiculous side of such efforts, and the War on Consciousness is actually deeply tragic. I will never understand it.
A comment on drug use perceived/experienced as "frivolous": don't you think it's this very war which made something that should be treated seriously - something indeed frivolous, and too often perceived this way by the users themselves? Again the case of teenagers watching "The Simpsons" on ayahuasca... Many users of psychedelics never get an access to reliable information before trying the substances - I have known too many cases of people dropping acid without really knowing what exactly does it cause. How can an honest, respectful way to use those substances be presented to them if it's, as you wrote, made a criminal offence?
The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.