Check out actor and anti-marijuana activist Stephen Baldwin, Fox news analyst / former California prosecutor Kimberly Guilfoyle, president of Oaksterdam University Richard Lee, and Fox host Geraldo Rivera discussing the perceived dangers and merits of marijuana legalization.
I was a bit taken aback by this one. It's a bit of a weird experience to see a Fox host bringing forward the best arguments in a legalization discussion. And the first 4 minutes of the video before the discussion starts actually give a pretty balanced view of the situation, considering it's Fox, that is.
b) The Republicans are for "family values," with the State keeping it illegal, it reduces the role of the parent/community as educator and shifts role to the State.
c) If you think the drug is unsafe you should want it REGULATED, NOT DEREGULATED
d) bring up scientific journal articles, name drop scientist show that Cannabis is not chemically addicting (which it isn't), and THC has actually been showed to KILL cancer cells in the lungs (which it has) it's the particulate matter which is a problem which can be mitigated by a vaporizer ... which comes down to EDUCATION!. Also they should bring up studies on HU210 (look it up).
d) Bring up the historical, religious context of the plant, and how humans have been using it for thousands of years.
e) Bring up the reasons of why it was made illegal, and the Hearst story.
f) Show the War on Drugs uses fear instead of economic fact. We have to look at other countries (Portugal I am thinking of specifically, most liberal drug laws in Europe) and whether legalization has increased usage (it hasn't). Also, the needle exchange program in Vancouver and how that has turned out if convo goes towards other drugs (success)!
g) Show what a drain it is to our prison system, with hard numbers (this isn't difficult)
h) Bring up the philosophical issue of people being able to do to their bodies what they want to unless it violates others rights, this conversation (if against a GOP'er) will quickly devolve to healthcare and having to pay for weed smokers healthcare, you can then flip the argument to say this is one more reason AGAINST socialized medicine (which the GOP will cream over). Do what you want to do, just don't come crying to the gov't when you make a bad decision. The argument needs to be tackled on historical, philosophical, and economic grounds. The battle is really ours to lose (like the election of 09 for the Dems), everything is in our favor - people will come around to the truth if presented to them in a proper manner.
Peace
The comments posted here do not reflect the views of the owners of this site.