SUGGEST A STORY  |   CREATE AN ACCOUNT  |  
DoseNation.com

Marijuana and cancer

In 2007, there were over 150 published preclinical and clinical studies assessing the therapeutic potential of marijuana and several of its active compounds, known as cannabinoids. These numerous studies are in a book, now in its third edition, entitled Emerging Clinical Applications for Cannabis and Cannabinoids: A Review of the Scientific Literature. (NORML Foundation, 2008) One chapter in this book, which summarized the findings of more than 30 separate trials and literature reviews, was dedicated to the use of cannabinoids as potential anti-cancer agents, particularly in the treatment of gliomas...

In fact, the first experiment documenting pot’s potent anti-cancer effects took place in 1974 at the Medical College of Virginia at the behest federal bureaucrats. The results of that study, reported in an Aug. 18, 1974, Washington Post newspaper feature, were that marijuana’s primary psychoactive component, THC, “slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent.”

...In the past 10 years scientists overseas have generously picked up where U.S. researchers so abruptly left off, reporting that cannabinoids can halt the spread of numerous cancer cells — including prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, and brain cancer. (An excellent paper summarizing much of this research, “Cannabinoids for Cancer Treatment: Progress and Promise,” appears in the January 2008 edition of the journal Cancer Research.) A 2006 patient trial published in the British Journal of Cancer even reported that the intracranial administration of THC was associated with reduced tumor cell proliferation in humans with advanced glioblastoma.

Writing earlier this year in the scientific journal Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, Italian researchers reiterated, “(C)annabinoids have displayed a great potency in reducing glioma tumor growth. (They) appear to be selective antitumoral agents as they kill glioma cells without affecting the viability of nontransformed counterparts.” Not one mainstream media outlet reported their findings. Perhaps now they’ll pay better attention.

Posted By jamesk at 2009-09-22 12:06:39 permalink | comments
Facebook it! Twitter it! Digg it! Reddit! StumbleUpon It! Google Bookmark del.icio.us technorati Furl Yahoo! Bookmark
» More ways to bookmark this page


Morrison : 2009-10-01 14:54:05
Yes and each time the find a plant compound that seems to work to some degree, instead of giving it green light for clinical trials and FDA approval and start saving lifes, they rather spend 10 more years finding a synthetic derivative of said compound which they can get a patent on. It is so disillusioning to realize that the people we entrust with our health consistently throw ethics and humanistic principles out the window when having the choice between turning a bigger profit and saving human lives.
adam. : 2009-09-23 16:24:19
this is why I don't donate to cancer research. they are all trying desperately to find a cure that can recoup their money, the same people we can deduce must be the most aware of this - they must know about all the cancer research done and the results of it, they are in the field of cancer research! And they keep looking everywhere else for a cure, well, we have one, and it keeps the doctor away. But the continued search for finding cures that specifically aren't connected to marijuana is pathetic, it can only seem like greed or "morality" to me.
primordialstu. : 2009-09-22 17:44:06
Interesting (and sadly ironic) that both Terence McKenna and Bob Marley died of cancers that might have been treatable with an herb they both usually had close to hand.
Synchronium.net. : 2009-09-22 16:21:07
And yet the UK is considering banning all synthetic cannabinoids as they have "no medicinal value".
?. : 2009-09-22 15:10:58
Glioblastoma...that's what Terence had! No one offered to inject THC intracranial for him... that's just too bad.
motley. : 2009-09-22 14:49:48
They better but they won't.its never been about the truth has it ?
bricoleur. : 2009-09-22 14:15:35
Thank you.
All anonymous comments will be reviewed by a moderator before going live.
Your Name:

Follow DoseNation

Daily E-mail
  » More subscription options

Recently @ DoseNation

Sites We Like

CelebStoner
Coilhouse
Comfort Radio
Daily Transmission
Drug Law Blog
Drug WarRant
DrugCritics
Ectoplasmosis
Erik Davis
EROCx1
Erowid
Gaian Botanicals
Gnostic Media
h+ Magazine
Loopy Lettuce
LSD Research
Mark Pesce
Matrixmasters
MedBuds.org
MilkandCookies
Narco Polo
Neuroethics & Law Blog
Neurophilosophy
ParaTheatrical ReSearch
Psy Press UK
Psychedelic Salon
Psychointegrator
Psychonaut.com
Psychopraxis
R6XX.com
Ramez Naam
Renegade Futurist
Roaming The Mind
RU Sirius Show
Scotto
Shroomery News
Singing to the Plants
SlashDrugs
Slog
Strange Attractor
Supermassive News
Synchronium
Tales From The Tripside
The Mad Artist
The Teleomorph
Toke of the Town
Tonx
Tripzine
Warren Ellis
Xenolinguistics
HOME
COMMENTS
NEWS
ARCHIVE
EDITORS
REVIEW POLICY
SUGGEST A STORY
CREATE AN ACCOUNT
RSS | TWITTER | FACEBOOK
DIGG | REDDIT | SHARE